The Data Mining Forum 
IMPORTANT: This is the old Data Mining forum.
I keep it online so that you can read the old messages.
Please post your new messages in the new forum: https://forum2.philippe-fournier-viger.com/index.php
Report on bugs found on Apriori & BIDE+ source codes
Posted by:
siewlee
Date: July 20, 2014 07:10AM
Hi,
I would like to report some bugs found from the source codes for Apriori & BIDE algorithms.
AlgoApriori.java:
line 102, 128, 130, 133, 180, 187, 192, 198, 274, 316, 338, 351
AlgoBIDEPlus.java:
Line 207, 242, 257, 292, 315, 335, 339, 340, 448, 467, 485, 496, 518, 522, 560, 678, 745, 780
AlgoFEAT.java:
Line 145, 151, 352, 363, 384, 586, 589, 805, 808, 912, 916, 920
AlgoFSGP.java:
Line 86, 153, 159, 221, 253, 350, 502, 513, 590, 762, 766, 770,
AlgoMaxSP.java
Line 168, 219, 249, 264, 342, 346, 347, 454, 473, 491, 502, 524, 528, 566, 645, 684, 751, 786
AlgoPrefixSpan.java
Line 108, 114, 215, 249, 260, 281, 337, 500, 504
AlgoTSP_nonClosed.java
Line 78, 79, 84, 211, 253, 259, 279, 290, 311,367, 535, 537, 543, 555, 558, 559
Candidate.java
Line 21
Pair.java
Line 42, 59, 61, 71, 74
PairBIDE.java
Line 55, 56, 57, 59, 71, 72, 74
PseudoSequence.java
Line 99, 198, 199, 235, 247, 254, 261
PseudoSequenceBIDE.java
Line 54, 56,57,58, 60, 77, 79, 80 81, 83, 97, 99, 100, 148, 158, 166, 167, 174, 175, 179, 180, 188, 189, 194, 195, 209, 210, 218, 221, 225, 382, 384, 396, 400, 423, 453, 457, 467, 470, 502, 506, 516, 519, 537, 557, 601, 637, 671, 674, 682, 683, 695, 699
SequentialPattern.java
Line 45, 47, 55, 59, 126, 127, 154, 155, 237
SequentialPatterns.java
Line 64, 104
Would appreciate if you could kindly fix the bugs.
Thank you.
I would like to report some bugs found from the source codes for Apriori & BIDE algorithms.
AlgoApriori.java:
line 102, 128, 130, 133, 180, 187, 192, 198, 274, 316, 338, 351
AlgoBIDEPlus.java:
Line 207, 242, 257, 292, 315, 335, 339, 340, 448, 467, 485, 496, 518, 522, 560, 678, 745, 780
AlgoFEAT.java:
Line 145, 151, 352, 363, 384, 586, 589, 805, 808, 912, 916, 920
AlgoFSGP.java:
Line 86, 153, 159, 221, 253, 350, 502, 513, 590, 762, 766, 770,
AlgoMaxSP.java
Line 168, 219, 249, 264, 342, 346, 347, 454, 473, 491, 502, 524, 528, 566, 645, 684, 751, 786
AlgoPrefixSpan.java
Line 108, 114, 215, 249, 260, 281, 337, 500, 504
AlgoTSP_nonClosed.java
Line 78, 79, 84, 211, 253, 259, 279, 290, 311,367, 535, 537, 543, 555, 558, 559
Candidate.java
Line 21
Pair.java
Line 42, 59, 61, 71, 74
PairBIDE.java
Line 55, 56, 57, 59, 71, 72, 74
PseudoSequence.java
Line 99, 198, 199, 235, 247, 254, 261
PseudoSequenceBIDE.java
Line 54, 56,57,58, 60, 77, 79, 80 81, 83, 97, 99, 100, 148, 158, 166, 167, 174, 175, 179, 180, 188, 189, 194, 195, 209, 210, 218, 221, 225, 382, 384, 396, 400, 423, 453, 457, 467, 470, 502, 506, 516, 519, 537, 557, 601, 637, 671, 674, 682, 683, 695, 699
SequentialPattern.java
Line 45, 47, 55, 59, 126, 127, 154, 155, 237
SequentialPatterns.java
Line 64, 104
Would appreciate if you could kindly fix the bugs.
Thank you.
Re: Report on bugs found on Apriori & BIDE+ source codes
Posted by:
webmasterphilfv
Date: July 20, 2014 11:10AM
Hi,
I think that you mean compilation errors.
However, I have downloaded the latest version of SPMF on the website and installed it in a new java project in Eclipse and there is not compliation errors.
I suggest to create a new clean project and then reinstall the source code using the latest version by following the installation instructions on the download page.
Also, if you have a very old version of Java, it may be a problem. On my computer everything work fine using Java 1.7, so anything >= 1.7 should be ok.
Philippe
I think that you mean compilation errors.
However, I have downloaded the latest version of SPMF on the website and installed it in a new java project in Eclipse and there is not compliation errors.
I suggest to create a new clean project and then reinstall the source code using the latest version by following the installation instructions on the download page.
Also, if you have a very old version of Java, it may be a problem. On my computer everything work fine using Java 1.7, so anything >= 1.7 should be ok.
Philippe