The Data Mining Forum                             open-source data mining software data mining conferences Data Science for Social and Behavioral Analytics DSSBA 2022 data science journal
IMPORTANT: This is the old Data Mining forum.
I keep it online so that you can read the old messages.

Please post your new messages in the new forum: https://forum2.philippe-fournier-viger.com/index.php
 
The discussion about the minFHM algorithm
Posted by: NguyenHung
Date: September 18, 2018 08:42PM

Hello, Prof. Philippe Fournier-Viger

1. To check the minFHM algorithm, we consider the dataset "DB_utility.txt" in the example on the webpage at address (URL) http://www.philippe-fournier-viger.com/spmf/MinFHM.php
3 5 1 2 4 6:30:1 3 5 10 6 5
3 5 2 4:20:3 3 8 6
3 1 4:8:1 5 2
3 5 1 7:27:6 6 10 5
3 5 2 7:11:2 3 4 2

2. In fact, the set of minimal high utility itemsets of "DB_utility.txt" must consist of three sets as follows:
itemsets utility
{2, 4} 30
{2 5} 31
{1 5 3} 31

3. Therefore, The result of the example on the webpage at http://www.philippe-fournier-viger.com/spmf/MinFHM.php and the result of minFHM in SPMF open-source data mining library are incorrect.
We modified the following segment of code to correct the minFHM:
private void minfhm(...) {
...
//If the itemset pXY passes the LA-Prune strategy.
if(pXY != null) {
// If pX is a high utility itemset.
// we save the itemset: pX
int[] itemset = ArraysAlgos...

if(pXY.sumIutils >= minUtility && ...){
register...
}else if (!isSubsumingAFoundItemset(itemset)){ // is corrected
exULs.add(pXY);
}
} ..
}

Please check my review.
Thank you in advance!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The discussion about the minFHM algorithm
Date: September 20, 2018 08:17AM

Hi,

Yes, I think you are right. There seems to be a bug in the implementation. Thanks for reporting it. I should release a new version of SPMF in about 1 week and half because I will have a week of holiday. I will then fix the bug, and also add several new algorithms related to high utility itemset mining that some people have sent to me recently.

By the way, I will also add your name to the list of contributors for reporting and fixing the bug!

Best regards,

Philippe

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The discussion about the minFHM algorithm
Posted by: NguyenHung
Date: September 20, 2018 08:48PM

Many thanks for your reply,

I'm very happy if my name is included in the list of contributors of SPMF.

Best regards,
NguyenHung

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The discussion about the minFHM algorithm
Date: October 02, 2018 08:24AM

Dear Hung,

Just to let you know that I have updated SPMF a few minutes ago. I have included your bug fix for MinFHM. Besides that I have added 5 new algorithms!

Also, as promised, you are now in the list of contributors. ;-)

Thanks for your help!

Best,

Philippe

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The discussion about the minFHM algorithm
Date: October 21, 2018 10:47PM

Hi all,

Just to let everyone know that I have posted a video presentation of the MinFHM algorithm:

http://www.philippe-fournier-viger.com/spmf/videos/MinFHM.php

It gives an overview of the paper but does not discuss all the details.

Best,

Philippe

Options: ReplyQuote


This forum is powered by Phorum and provided by P. Fournier-Viger (© 2012).
Terms of use.