Posted by:
chen
Date: September 24, 2021 04:38AM
Dr. Fournier-Viger
Many thanks for your work on SPM. Your paper bring me into this domain.
But when I read your paper, I found some conflict between the theory and the example. In the paper:
Closed sequential patterns [56, 48, 30, 108, 109] are the set of sequential patterns that are not included in other sequential patterns having the same support, that is: CS = {sa|sa ∈ FS∧ ̸ ∃sb ∈ FS such that sa
Many thanks for your work on SPM. Your paper bring me into this domain.
But when I read your paper, I found some conflict between the theory and the example. In the paper:
Closed sequential patterns [56, 48, 30, 108, 109] are the set of sequential patterns that are not included in other sequential patterns having the same support, that is: CS = {sa|sa ∈ FS∧ ̸ ∃sb ∈ FS such that sa
A question about <A Survey of Sequential Pattern Mining>
Posted by:
chen
Date: September 24, 2021 04:50AM
the page did not display completely. please check the following link:
https://www.jianshu.com/p/6decaac80585
https://www.jianshu.com/p/6decaac80585
Re: A question about <A Survey of Sequential Pattern Mining>
Posted by:
webmasterphilfv
Date: September 24, 2021 06:44AM
Good evening,
Thanks for reading the paper.
There was indeed an error in the example.
Since <(a)> and <(a),(f)> have the same support, the pattern <(a)> cannot be closed!
I have fixed the PDF of the paper that is hosted on my website to remove this error.
If you spot some other problems, please let me know.
Best regards,
Thanks for reading the paper.
There was indeed an error in the example.
Since <(a)> and <(a),(f)> have the same support, the pattern <(a)> cannot be closed!
I have fixed the PDF of the paper that is hosted on my website to remove this error.
If you spot some other problems, please let me know.
Best regards,